Cars.com’s editors have made passing references in car reviews and elsewhere that we’d begun our own effort to measure vehicle cargo spaces. Now we’ve methodically recorded enough of them to begin sharing the results en masse. We’re far from filling out every vehicle class, but we have enough to highlight a few that we’ll call the best until something else unseats them.
We give far more details in the article linked above, but we’ll emphasize that we undertook this program because we’ve found ordinary cargo specifications to be inconsistent at best and suspect at worst. To be clear, these numbers, even when they appear on third-party resources like Cars.com, are almost without exception manufacturer-supplied. The automotive industry relies heavily on self-reporting and self-certification, on everything from safety and efficiency assurances to specs like these — based on guidelines from the federal government and standardizing bodies like SAE International. Varying interpretations alone are enough to inject error in the results, even if you trust that the individuals who work for one automaker can be unfailingly objective.
By all means, use the specs found elsewhere on our site, or on manufacturer or dealer sites. But you might also want to check out independent results from Cars.com editors, who ensure consistency not only from brand to brand, but between enclosed trunks and the open compartments in hatchbacks and SUVs — a puzzling fault in the SAE standard that uses different methodologies for trunks and hatches, yielding results that can’t be compared reliably.
Quick Tips for Using the Specifications Below
Don’t compare Cars.com and manufacturer specs. We believe Cars.com’s volume measurements compare consistently across sedans, coupes, SUVs and anything else with a liftgate, and we think they represent how normal people use their vehicles. But comparing them to manufacturer-supplied specs isn’t meaningful.
Trunks run high, hatches low. The manufacturer standard greatly underestimates trunk volume, so Cars.com’s numbers are consistently higher. Conversely, our numbers for anything with a liftgate will seem low compared to what automakers publicize because we measure to the top of the rear seatback (this maintains rear visibility and helps prevent cargo from becoming projectiles in a crash). A large item that extends above this plane certainly occupies more space. Many trunks achieve similar ends with a folding backseat.
There’s no “maximum” cargo volume. We don’t provide a “maximum” cargo volume, often cited as space behind the first row that includes volume when the second row or backseat of any hatchback, SUV or van is folded flat. This is simply because we haven’t developed a method we believe is reliable and consistent enough to account for the complex shapes involved (but we haven’t given up). In the meantime, if you rely on manufacturer-supplied maximum figures, remember that they can be compared only to other manufacturer specs, not the numbers below.
Volume may vary by trim level. We list the model year and trim level tested below. We believe all 2020 results shown here are accurate for the 2021 model year. Different trim levels can result in volume differences due to equipment like spare tires, audio equipment and adjustable floors.
Other areas are broken out. A handful of models have major additional storage areas. Vehicles without engines under the hood, for example, sometimes provide a front trunk (or “frunk”) in that area. And some models, like Chrysler’s minivans, furnish underfloor compartments in the passenger area. We measure those spaces, too, but rather than combining them into any volumes from the traditional cargo area cited, we’ve appended the results with a separate volume spec and footnote.
Cars.com photo by Christian Lantry
Small SUVs
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|
Hyundai Tucson Hybrid | 2022 Limited | 21.7 |
Hyundai Tucson | 2022 Limited | 21.5 |
Honda CR-V | 2021 Touring | 21.5 |
Tesla Model Y | 2021 Long Range | 20.9+2.9† |
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid | 2022 Limited | 20.7 |
Infiniti QX55 | 2022 Sensory | 20.6 |
Volkswagen Tiguan | 2022 SEL R-Line | 20.3 |
Honda CR-V Hybrid | 2021 Touring | 19.6 |
Nissan Rogue | 2021 Platinum | 19.3 |
Hyundai Ioniq 5 | 2022 Limited | 19.1 |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe | 2020 AMG GLC43 | 18.9 |
Volkswagen ID.4 | 2021 1st Edition | 18.9 |
Toyota RAV4 Prime | 2021 SE | 18.7 |
Acura RDX | 2022 2.0T Advance Package with A-Spec | 18.3 |
Lexus NX | 2022 350 | 18.3 |
Subaru Forester | 2021 Sport | 18.2 |
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited | 2022 Rubicon 392 | 18.2 |
Mazda CX-5 | 2021 Signature | 17.9 |
Kia EV6 | 2022 GT-Line | 17.7 |
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited 4xe plug-in hybrid | 2021 4xe | 17.7 |
Volvo XC40 Recharge | 2021 Recharged P8 | 17.7 |
Lexus NX 450h Plus | 2022 F Sport | 17.3 |
Nissan Rogue | 2021 SV | 17.1 |
Volvo XC60 plug-in hybrid | 2021 Recharge T8 Inscription | 16.8 |
Genesis GV70 | 2022 Sport Prestige | 16.2 |
Kia Seltos | 2021 SX | 16.3 |
Jeep Compass | 2022 Limited | 16.0 |
Ford Mustang Mach-E | 2021 Premium | 15.9+2.0† |
Lexus NX | 2021 300h Luxury | 15.9 |
Toyota Venza | 2021 XLE | 15.2 |
Volkswagen Taos | 2022 SE | 15.2 |
Toyota Corolla Cross | 2022 XLE | 14.2 |
Buick Envision | 2021 Essence | 14.1 |
Lincoln Corsair | 2021 Reserve | 14.1 |
Ford Bronco Sport | 2021 Badlands | 13.9 |
Mazda CX-30 | 2020 Premium | 13.7 |
Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class | 2021 GLA250 | 13.5 |
Chevrolet Trailblazer | 2021 RS | 13.5 |
Subaru Crosstrek | 2021 Limited | 13.0 |
Hyundai Kona | 2022 Limited | 10.9 |
Lexus UX | 2020 250h hybrid | 9.1 |
†Volume measured in front trunks
Mid-Size 2-Row SUVs
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|
Hyundai Santa Fe | 2021 Calligraphy | 25.3 |
Genesis GV80 two-row | 2021 Prestige | 23.5 |
Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport | 2021 SEL Premium | 20.7 |
Cadillac XT5 | 2022 Premium Luxury | 20.3 |
Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2022 Summit Reserve | 20.3 |
Audi SQ8 | 2020 Prestige | 20.2 |
Subaru Outback | 2022 Wilderness Edition | 19.6 |
Mid-Size 3-Row SUVs
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Second Row (Cubic Feet) | Space Behind Third Row (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|---|
Volkswagen Atlas | 2021 SEL Premium | 29.9 | 14.0 |
Hyundai Palisade | 2020 Limited | 26.2 | 11.2 |
Infiniti QX60 | 2022 Autograph | 25.5 | 9.9 |
Nissan Pathfinder | 2022 Platinum | 24.1 | 8.4 |
Toyota Highlander | 2021 XSE | 24.0 | 8.6 |
Mazda CX-9 | 2021 Signature | 23.7 | 9.8 |
Acura MDX | 2022 Advance | 23.6 | 11.1 |
Subaru Ascent | 2022 Onyx Edition | 23.6 | 10.3 |
Lincoln Aviator | 2020 Reserve | 23.1 | 10.5 |
Kia Sorento | 2021 SX Prestige | 23.1 | 10.5 |
Genesis GV80 three-row | 2021 Advanced Plus | 22.1 | 6.8 |
Jeep Grand Cherokee L | 2021 Summit Reserve | 22.0 | 10.9 |
Dodge Durango | 2021 SRT 392 | 21.8 | 9.4 |
Mitsubishi Outlander | 2022 SEL | 19.2 | 6.9 |
Land Rover Discovery | 2021 R Dynamic S | 18.7 | 4.6 |
Lexus GX 460 | 2022 Black Line | 18.5 | 3.2 |
Full-Size SUVs
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat/Second Row (Cubic Feet) | Space Behind Third Row (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|---|
Chevrolet Suburban | 2021 High Country | 41.8 | 23.0 |
Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2022 Series III | 38.9 | 17.2 |
Jeep Wagoneer | 2022 Series III | 36.6 | 16.4 |
Cadillac Escalade | 2021 Platinum | 30.9 | 13.2 |
Toyota Land Cruiser two-row | 2021 Heritage Edition | 30.5 | N/A |
GMC Yukon | 2021 AT4 | 30.3 | 12.9 |
Chevrolet Tahoe | 2021 Z71 | 30.3 | 12.8 |
Nissan Armada | 2021 SL | 24.0 | 10.4 |
Minivans
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Second Row (Cubic Feet) | Space Behind Third Row (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|---|
Kia Carnival | 2022 SX | 45.5 | 23.0 |
Toyota Sienna | 2021 XSE with Super Long Slide seats midway back | 44.6 | 21.7 |
Chrysler Pacifica | 2021 Limited | 41.6+3.2†† | 17.6+3.2†† |
Honda Odyssey | 2021 Elite | 41.6 | 21.1 |
Toyota Sienna | 2021 XSE with Super Long Slide seats fully back | 32.6 | 21.7 |
††Volume measured in underfloor Stow ‘n Go compartments
Small Cars
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|
Toyota Corolla sedan | 2020 XSE | 19.1 |
Hyundai Elantra sedan | 2021 SEL Premium | 19.0 |
Honda Civic sedan | 2020 Touring | 18.8 |
Nissan Sentra | 2020 SV | 18.8 |
Honda Civic sedan | 2022 Touring | 18.1 |
Ford Mustang coupe | 2021 Mach 1 Premium | 17.0 |
Nissan Kicks | 2021 SR | 16.9 |
Honda Civic hatchback | 2022 Sport Touring | 16.5 |
Lexus RC coupe | 2021 350 F Sport | 15.0 |
Cadillac CT4 | 2020 CT4-V | 13.7 |
Genesis G70 | 2022 3.3T Sport Prestige | 13.4 |
Mazda3 hatchback | 2021 Premium | 13.1 |
Toyota Prius | 2021 XLE | 13.1 |
Audi A3 | 2022 Premium Plus | 12.8 |
Mid-Size Cars
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|
Mercedes-Benz E-Class wagon | 2022 E450 All-Terrain | 21.1 |
Kia K5 | 2021 EX | 20.3 |
Honda Accord Hybrid | 2021 Touring | 19.9 |
Hyundai Sonata | 2021 Limited | 19.8 |
Toyota Camry | 2021 TRD | 19.4 |
Volvo V90 Cross Country | 2022 B6 | 18.9 |
Volkswagen Passat | 2021 R-Line | 18.5 |
Mazda6 | 2021 Signature | 18.4 |
BMW 5 Series | 2021 540i Premium M Sport | 17.9 |
Genesis G80 | 2021 Prestige 3.5T | 16.1 |
Kia Stinger | 2022 GT-Line 2.5T | 15.1 |
Cadillac CT5 | 2020 Premium Luxury | 13.3 |
Karma GS-6 | 2021 Luxury | 7.4 |
Full-Size Cars
Make, Model | Model Year, Trim Level Tested* | Space Behind Backseat (Cubic Feet) |
---|---|---|
Mercedes-Benz S-Class sedan | 2021 S580 | 17.4 |
*Though some tested vehicles were earlier models, we believe all 2020 results shown are accurate for the 2021 model year. Different trim levels can result in volume differences due to equipment like spare tires, audio equipment and adjustable floors.
Editor’s note: This story was updated Jan. 18, 2022.
Keyword: Which SUVs, Minivans and Sedans Have the Most Cargo Space?