Ohio now requires drivers and passengers to provide identifying details. Refusing to comply may bring misdemeanor charges and possible jail time. Critics expect constitutional challenges over privacy and Fifth Amendment rights. Traffic stops in Ohio are about to go down in a way they never previously have. Governor Mike DeWine just signed House Bill 492 into law. It makes it so that passengers who refuse to identify themselves during a lawful traffic stop could be charged with a criminal offense. Law enforcement groups call it a fix for a loophole. Civil liberty advocates say it’s an overreach that could criminalize behavior that has long been legal. Regardless of which side one falls on, the law goes into effect soon. What The Law Actually Requires Under the legislation, a peace officer who reasonably suspects that a driver or passenger has committed a violation of Ohio’s motor vehicle laws can require them to provide their name, address, and date of birth. Refusing to do so is now a fourth-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $250 fine. The law specifically states that occupants cannot be compelled to answer questions beyond those three pieces of identifying information. Ford The bill also expands Ohio’s prohibition against interfering with an officer enforcing traffic laws. Previously limited to certain offenses, the revised language applies across Ohio’s entire motor vehicle code and increases the penalty from a minor misdemeanor to a second-degree misdemeanor, carrying a maximum sentence of 90 days in jail and a $750 fine. Read: One State Just Can’t Stop Its Traffic Cameras Printing Money According to WTOL, supporters, including the Ohio State Highway Patrol and the Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio, argued the legislation was necessary because Ohio appellate courts had repeatedly ruled that simply refusing to identify yourself during a traffic stop did not constitute obstruction of official business. Those rulings left officers with few legal options when motorists or passengers declined to cooperate. Opponents see things very differently. The Case Against It The Ohio Public Defender’s Office, as Police1.com reports, warned that the broadened interference language could expose motorists to much harsher penalties during routine stops involving relatively minor issues, such as expired registration tags or a broken taillight. Columbus defense attorney Darren Meade has also predicted the law will face constitutional challenges, particularly involving the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. Even supporters acknowledge litigation is likely. The law doesn’t take effect immediately, as Ohio drivers and passengers have roughly three months before the new identification requirements become enforceable. Whether the legislation survives the inevitable court challenges, however, remains an open question. Lead Image Credit: Ohio State Patrol
+65 others
