These small yet practical hatchbacks are all much more affordable at two years old, but which is the best buy?...
- The contenders
- Peugeot 208 Puretech 100 Allure
- Renault Clio TCe 100 RS Line
- Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 Beats
- Performance, ride, handling, refinement
The contenders
Peugeot 208 Puretech 100 Allure
List price when new £18,850Price today £14,000*
Available from 2019-present
Fans of sharp styling and classy interiors will find the 208 very alluring
Renault Clio TCe 100 RS Line
List price when new £17,750Price today £13,000*
Available from 2019-present
A sporty choice, and the Clio is the cheapest car here
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 95 Beats
List price when new £17,750Price today £14,000*
Available from 2020-present
The Polo is a good all-rounder, but is it better than these rivals?
*Price today is based on a 2020 model with average mileage and full service history, correct at time of writing
Few small cars are as versatile as the Volkswagen Polo, with it feeling every bit as at home when cruising on the motorway as it is in the cut and thrust of urban driving. Think of it as a Swiss Army knife, minus the pointy edges.
However, simply doing various jobs well isn’t always enough, particularly when competition is fierce. And, on the face of it, some of the Polo’s rivals could make even better used buys.
First of all, there’s the Peugeot 208, which not only looks eye-catching inside and out, but feels impressively upmarket. Or for slightly less money you could have a Renault Clio in range-topping RS Line trim. Let’s see which of the three you should you choose
We’ve gathered together two-year-old examples of these three cars to find a champion. Let battle commence.
Driving
Performance, ride, handling, refinement
Each of these hatchbacks has a three-cylinder turbocharged engine with around 100bhp, so you’d expect similar performance across the board. But in reality, the 208 has a noticeable extra spring in its step. This is partly because its engine produces more pull at low revs, but also because, unlike its rivals, it has a six-speed gearbox rather than a five-speeder, allowing you to find the sweet spot in the engine’s rev range more easily.
The Clio and Polo are fairly closely matched for acceleration, although the former’s engine does have a few noticeable flat spots. This just means you can feel the rate of acceleration ebbing and flowing as you get up to speed, whereas in the Polo it’s more consistent. The Clio also does the least impressive job of isolating you from engine vibration, especially at low revs when you’re working the engine hard.
Although the Polo’s engine makes itself heard the most under acceleration, it’s a fair bit smoother than the Clio’s. But when it comes to both engine smoothness and quietness, the 208 is king of this triumvirate.
The Clio proves slightly disappointing in other respects, too, with the notchiest gearbox and by far the most tyre roar on the motorway – the main reason why it posted the highest decibel reading at 70mph in our tests. Despite its longer shift action and slightly numb clutch pedal, the 208’s gearbox is slicker and there’s a lot less road noise to trouble your ears. There’s a fair bit of wind whistle on the motorway, though, leaving the Polo as the quietest cruiser by a small margin. And as a bonus, the Polo has the slickest gearshift and is generally the easiest to drive smoothly.
Although you’d never describe it as sporty, the Polo inspires plenty of confidence with the way it goes around corners. There’s lots of grip, not too much body lean and the steering, while not as communicative as a Ford Fiesta’s, gives you a decent sense of connection with the front wheels, letting you place the car just where you want it. The Clio stays even more upright through bends, though, and has quicker, more accurate steering.
And the 208? Well, that’s the boulevard cruiser of the trio, with the most body lean through tight twists and turns and slightly vague steering. But it makes up for that by having the cushiest ride, rounding off bumps impressively at all speeds, at least on the 16in wheels of our test car (most UK cars have 17s). The Clio’s suspension is quite a bit firmer, although it’s sophisticated enough to deal with sharp-edged bumps in one go, so there’s no unpleasant shudder over potholes.
In comparison with these rivals, the Polo’s ride is slightly more unsettled in most situations, although it’s still one of the more comfortable cars in the wider small hatchback class.
Keyword: Used test: Peugeot 208 vs Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo