The battle for the dominance of the electric vehicle sector would likely be determined by the market’s key battery makers. With this in mind, companies such as BYD, CATL, and Tesla — all of whom are exploring the structural battery form factor — have the chance to become the trailblazers of the next generation of electric car batteries.

During its Battery Day event, Tesla announced its 4680 cells, which are used alongside the company’s structural battery pack. BYD, on the other hand, has also released its Blade batteries, which also adopt a non-modular approach. CATL’s Qilin batteries are in the same segment, with its structural battery design.

Electric vehicle battery enthusiast Jordan Giesige of YouTube’s The Limiting Factor channel recently conducted a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Tesla, BYD, and CATL’s next-generation structural packs. Each battery pack was evaluated according to several factors, such as design, rigidity, packing and energy density, and safety, before being ranked. It should be noted that the figures used in the comparisons are drawn from estimates and materials released by Tesla, BYD, and CATL themselves, not current real-world observations.

As noted by Giesige, Tesla’s 4680 structural battery packs utilize hundreds of cylindrical cells with a cooling ribbon in between every other row of cells. A lid is then placed on top and polyurethane foam is injected into the pack. This polyurethane hardens, and the combination of the foam and the battery cells forms a rigid, honeycomb-type structure.

CATL Qilin batteries, which could be fitted with both nickel and iron-based cells, integrate thermal pads, the liquid cooling plate, and the cross bracing to create what could be described as structural cooling. The structural cooling is placed between each row of prismatic battery cells, and the cells themselves are placed into the pack directly without any modules. BYD Blade batteries use iron-based prismatic cells, though these cells are longer and thinner than those used by CATL. The cells are then stretched across the BYD Blade battery pack, allowing the cells themselves to replace conventional steel beams.

In the rankings of the next-generation batteries, the YouTube host noted that Tesla’s 4680 structural battery pack would likely be the most rigid among its peers. Tesla’s 4680 pack loses out in terms of packing density, however, as BYD and CATL’s use of prismatic cells maximizes volumetric energy density. With this in mind, and considering that CATL’s Qilin batteries can be fitted with high-energy density nickel-based cells, a nickel-based Qilin battery would likely be more energy dense than a nickel-based Tesla 4680 pack or a BYD Blade structural battery, which uses less energy dense iron-based cells.

tesla 4680 cells compared with byd blade and catl qilin structural batteries

Credit: The Limiting Factor/Twitter

As for cooling, Giesige noted that the BYD Blade batteries’ plate cooling would likely fall short of the Tesla 4680 pack and CATL Qilin battery’s cooling systems. In its marketing materials, CATL highlighted that cooling the sides of the Qilin battery increases the pack’s cooling area four times. Tesla’s 4680 battery also uses better cooling than BYD’s Blade batteries with its side cooling system, though it would likely not be as good as the cooling of CATL’s Qilin structural packs.

While BYD’s Blade batteries lose out in cooling, they are, likely the safest among its peers. This is because the BYD Blade battery uses iron-based cells, which have a higher decomposition and lower heat release temperature than the nickel-based cells used in Tesla’s 4680 cells and CATL’s nickel-based Qilin batteries. An iron-based Qilin battery comes second to the BYD Blade, partly due to its use of shorter and thicker prismatic cells, which may trap more heat.

tesla 4680 cells compared with byd blade and catl qilin structural batteries

Credit: The Limiting Factor/Twitter

tesla 4680 cells compared with byd blade and catl qilin structural batteries

Credit: The Limiting Factor/Twitter

A Qilin pack with nickel-based cells was ranked last in terms of safety by the battery enthusiast, as Tesla’s 4680 pack with nickel-based cells features several safety systems, such as an overpressure mechanism on the bottom of the cells themselves. Since 4680 cells are also smaller than the prismatic cells used in the BYD Blade and CATL Qilin, they contain less energy. The 4680 cells themselves are enclosed in a thick shell as well, which are about 2-3 times thicker than a conventional battery.

Overall, Giesige noted that Tesla’s 4680 cells are likely the best all-rounder compared to its peers in the structural battery segment. The overall scores of the BYD Blade and CATL Qilin batteries bode well for Tesla’s future, however, as the companies could become suppliers of the EV maker in the future. CATL is already supplying Tesla with LFP batteries today, and BYD is heavily rumored to be a Tesla supplier as well. In a way, the analysis of the next-generation structural EV batteries shows that Tesla is not alone in pushing the battery industry forward.

Watch The Limiting Factor‘s full analysis in the video below.

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

Keyword: Tesla 4680 cells compared with BYD Blade and CATL Qilin structural batteries

CAR'S NEWS RELATED

Tesla Model 3 Refresh "Project Highland" Out Testing Under Wraps

Tesla doesn't typically hide its models when they're out testing, so perhaps there's something special about the new Model 3.

View more: Tesla Model 3 Refresh "Project Highland" Out Testing Under Wraps

Ford is in ‘deep development’ of its next-generation EV pickup truck

Ford is in “deep development” of its next-generation electric vehicles, including a new, full-size EV pickup that will complement the automaker’s already-successful F-150 Lightning. Ford has been working on several new developments for its “Model e” division dedicated toward EVs in hopes of creating an industry-leading platform. One of ...

View more: Ford is in ‘deep development’ of its next-generation EV pickup truck

Tesla Model Y’s complete lineup now qualifies for EV tax credits through Inflation Reduction Act

Tesla’s complete lineup of Model Y trim levels now qualifies for electric vehicle tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act, as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has increased the applicable MSRP limit to $80,000 across each of the all-electric crossover’s configurations. In December, the IRS released a list of vehicles ...

View more: Tesla Model Y’s complete lineup now qualifies for EV tax credits through Inflation Reduction Act

U.S. Treasury makes more Tesla, Ford, GM EVs eligible for tax credits

Companies Tesla Inc General Motors Co Volkswagen AG Ford Motor Co WASHINGTON, Feb 3 (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department said Friday it will make more Tesla (TSLA.O), Ford Motor (F.N), General Motors (GM.N) and Volkswagen (VOWG_p.DE) electric vehicles eligible for up to $7,500 tax credits after it revised ...

View more: U.S. Treasury makes more Tesla, Ford, GM EVs eligible for tax credits

GM, BYD, Solid State Batteries And Electric Plane: Top EV News Feb 2

Yet another week is passing, and it was loaded up with fascinating EV news that's worth sharing with the world.

View more: GM, BYD, Solid State Batteries And Electric Plane: Top EV News Feb 2

Tesla Co-Founder JB Straubel Offers Insight On Battery Recycling

Straubel is racing to scale up his new company. He shares where he thinks battery recycling is headed and what challenges lie ahead.

View more: Tesla Co-Founder JB Straubel Offers Insight On Battery Recycling

Tesla Model Y Long Range Delivery Estimate Pushed To March-May 2023

This is a clear sign that demand for the Model Y LR is through the roof following the aggressive price cuts at the start of the year.

View more: Tesla Model Y Long Range Delivery Estimate Pushed To March-May 2023

Tesla Cybertruck alpha prototype shows off its bed’s space by holding multiple 35″ tires

As a pickup truck, the Tesla Cybertruck will be judged in part based on the utility that it can offer its users. With this in mind, the capacity of the vehicle’s bed would likely be one of Cybertruck’s make-or-break points. Making it too small would compromise the vehicle’s utility, and ...

View more: Tesla Cybertruck alpha prototype shows off its bed’s space by holding multiple 35″ tires

Tesla’s “Project Highland” Model 3 photos hint at upcoming updates worth keeping secret

Hyundai Ioniq 6 Beats Tesla Model 3 in EPA Range

BYD Atto 3 charges up at a Tesla Supercharger in Australia

First refreshed Tesla Model S spotted in Australia, but wait for deliveries continues

More pain ahead for legacy auto as Tesla slashes battery investment costs in half

Tesla Model 3 now third highest selling car, behind only Ranger and Hilux utes

Tesla Model 3 was Australia's top-selling passenger car in January

Tesla’s Elon Musk gives Cybertruck seal of approval after production beta review

Ford reports Q4 earnings: EPS miss, revenue beat, strong cash flow from Rivian stock sale

Elon Musk had “handshake deal” with Saudi PIF reps before “funding secured” tweet: former aide

Tesla considers options outside Nuevo Leon in Mexico due to energy supply concerns

Tesla China sells 66k vehicles in January despite Chinese New Year break

OTHER CAR NEWS

; Kênh kiến thức kỹ năng, phát triển bản thân, hướng nghiệp, blog nhân sự