Cars are supposed to be smarter than ever these days, but safety experts are calling for new standards to better determine the accuracy of the latest driver-assistance tech. The move comes after they found cars are misreading road signs or displaying the wrong speed limit as much as a quarter of the time. Intelligent speed assist (ISA) is one of the several advanced driver-assistance systems that the European Union has required be fitted to every new car sold on the continent since 2024, as part of its GSR2 safety regulations. Its job is to communicate the prevailing speed limit to the driver and alert them when it changes, using built-in cameras to read road signs and/or GPS data. The aim is to reduce collisions and injury by getting people to stay within the posted speed limit. The EU mandates that ISA systems are tested over a variety of roads and a total of 250 miles. To be approved, the system must recognise the correct speed limit for at least 90 per cent of the distance covered and must be able to display the new speed limit within at least two seconds of the vehicle passing the road sign. However, a new study by Thatcham Research examined the gaps between how ADAS tech is evaluated for approval in the UK and Europe, and how it performs in the real world. The team spent more than three weeks driving an MG ZS, BMW i5 and Tesla Model Y on a wide variety of roads and in different environments, covering a little over 4,500 miles in the process. Thatcham acknowledges that the distance-based method ISA systems are officially assessed provides a useful baseline, but it can also overlook performance at key moments, such as when speed limits change. The UK safety experts’ event-based approach measures accuracy at each of these key points, and testing the three cars highlighted a vast difference in performance compared with the official standard. The MG ZS was the worst of the three cars in the test. Even though its speed-limit warning scored 91.3 per cent accuracy across the distance, just above the EU’s required standard, when assessed in an event-based manner, it was only 74.3 per cent accurate. This means that roughly one in four times, the ISA was displaying the wrong speed limit. The Tesla Model Y performed better, because it was nearly 98 per cent accurate, according to the EU’s distance-based method, but just 82.6 per cent on Thatcham’s event-based scale. The BMW i5 was the best of the bunch, 98.39 per cent accurate across the driven distance and achieving a 90.3 per cent event-based accuracy. That said, those results mean that roughly one in 10 times the system was incorrect, which Thatcham says is “still not good enough for widespread acceptance [of ISA]”. The result of these inconsistencies is that drivers lack confidence in the systems, which leads to them turning them off. Thatcham’s testers also experienced the ISA displaying speed limits that are not legal in the UK multiple times. 5mph, 10mph, 15mph and even 100mph limits showed, which not only contributes to eroding trust, but can also lead to an increased collision risk if the system is linked to the car’s adaptive cruise control. An implausible speed limit reading can cause unwanted harsh braking or acceleration, again leading to the driver turning off the system. Thatcham is encouraging regulators and industry bodies to evolve the current approval standards by incorporating event-based assessment of ISA. This approach would better reflect real-world driving conditions and hopefully lead to the more consistent, reliable performance needed to improve consumer confidence. Meanwhile, improving the accuracy of these systems will require improvement in the camera and sensor calibration, and the GPS data. Euro NCAP has recently introduced major updates to its testing procedures so that driver-assistance systems will now be evaluated not only on their crash-prevention abilities on the test track, but also during real-world driving, specifically with the aim of improving acceptance with drivers. Among the changes is the accuracy of speed-limit information will be verified during on-road driving tests for the first time. Jonathan Hewett, CEO, Thatcham Research, said: “ADAS technologies represent one of the most significant opportunities we have to improve road safety, but that opportunity is only realised if the systems work correctly and earn the confidence of the people using them. “[Intelligent speed-limit assist] is a case in point,” he added. “The intent behind the legislation is sound; helping drivers stay within speed limits saves lives. But a system that misreads limits, intervenes unexpectedly or presents drivers with speed data that bears no relation to the road they are on does not assist them. It frustrates and distracts them, and they turn it off.” Want the latest car news in your inbox? Sign up to the free Auto Express email newsletter...
+5 others
